Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 30 of 30

Thread: dharma, doctrine and interpretation....

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    909
    Being raised a Unitarian, I belong to the category of "lost sheep". We get to go to a nicer part of purgatory than you hopeless sinners.
    Show me a man who has forgotten words, so that I can have a word with him.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    2,114
    Originally posted by Swordless
    you're in the category of "hopeless sinners" along with most of the rest of us
    that's probably a more accurate description of myself than "traveler on the path to enlightenment" anyway.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    1,822
    BL, youve got some mixed views on religion, are you a student or something? because that would make sense, heheheheh

    christ wasnt to christianity what the buddha is to buddhism, they werent the same, for example, the buddha was born a man and he became a buddha

    christ was god before and after his life as a man, he never was a man according to what is written

    imho, buddhism is great, i love it, but, the fact of the matter is, it really didnt teach anything new, that hadnt already been taught, world wide atleast im not so sure about asia altogether although i suspect daoism might have well predated alot of the basic teachings found in buddhism

    anyhow, doc has to stop comparing chinese monks to thai!! those thai have dirty feet! what do they know about buddhism

    in the end, all the schools, all the sects all the monasterys, are just there because peoples needs vary, atleast, they think they do, regardless your understanding of buddhism is and isnt always going to be personal, because when you reach a certain level of understanding, it doesnt make much difference because your at peace, and those around you can tell just by observing you in your 'buddha nature'
    "did you ask me to consider dick with you??" blooming tianshi lotus

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    6
    Maestro

    aren't we all students of some humanitarian aspect til we die??!!! Buddhism didn't teach anything new, to your av seeker , but it DID give somewhere for their thoughts on the matter to rest a mo.

    amitopho

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    909
    BL, I know you live in china, but please type in english.
    Show me a man who has forgotten words, so that I can have a word with him.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    6
    Originally posted by Maestro
    BL, youve got some mixed views on religion, are you a student or something? because that would make sense, heheheheh

    christ wasnt to christianity what the buddha is to buddhism, they werent the same, for example, the buddha was born a man and he became a buddha

    christ was god before and after his life as a man, he never was a man according to what is written

    imho, buddhism is great, i love it, but, the fact of the matter is, it really didnt teach anything new, that hadnt already been taught, world wide atleast im not so sure about asia altogether although i suspect daoism might have well predated alot of the basic teachings found in buddhism

    anyhow, doc has to stop comparing chinese monks to thai!! those thai have dirty feet! what do they know about buddhism

    in the end, all the schools, all the sects all the monasterys, are just there because peoples needs vary, atleast, they think they do, regardless your understanding of buddhism is and isnt always going to be personal, because when you reach a certain level of understanding, it doesnt make much difference because your at peace, and those around you can tell just by observing you in your 'buddha nature'
    yah, actually , studying for a phd in ch'an . :P

    christ wasn't akin to buddha, but if you understand the buddha nature, you see that he ( jesus) was a good example, regardless of how ppl have interperated and typed classed his actions to become a " deital relgion" since . Fact is, there was a man of this name way back when and he was a human acting with traits you might
    recognise in a buddha nature .


    A buddhist is a buddhist really and theravada/ mahayana or whatever region your buddhism is refined and relabelled in, we all share common foundations to a degree . And, considering post and during the wars and cr events and spilts in its practioners locations coupled with evolving environmental infulences and adaptations , ( as you will read about in my forthcomming book and dissertation) , it is all legit and has right of name and right of practice. as it hapens though, i think they're going to practice regardless of whether you think they are not.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    1,822
    a phd in chan eh..wow i didnt know such a thing existed, thats a little gay i think

    anyhow, i dont know what your talking about, you confused me
    "did you ask me to consider dick with you??" blooming tianshi lotus

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    73
    Originally posted by Maestro
    a phd in chan eh..wow i didnt know such a thing existed, thats a little gay i think
    Thank you Maestro. I don't know why but for some reason that gave me a good laugh.
    Reminds me of my friend that majored in Medieval Germanic Literature.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    415
    Quote Originally Posted by Maestro
    imho, buddhism is great, i love it, but, the fact of the matter is, it really didnt teach anything new, that hadnt already been taught, world wide atleast im not so sure about asia altogether although i suspect daoism might have well predated alot of the basic teachings found in buddhism
    The teachings found in Buddhism are simply facts as experienced by the Buddha. It was realized not created as a new idea. Besides that, there have been Buddhas before Shakyamuni and will be after as well. So, of course it has been taught before. And sooner or later, Buddhism may die out and a new person will arrise who will realize the same truths and will become a Buddha and the teachings will go on, just as what happened with the historicl Buddha. The Buddha taught that as long as there are people living with stress, there will be people to go beyond it and find the path to liberation. There will always be Buddhas to arrise, or Arhats who have followed the teachings of a Buddha and reached the same goal and liberation. Nothing is new or created. Truth has always been there and simply needs to be realized.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    1,822
    i agree xing, thank you for elaborateing my point
    "did you ask me to consider dick with you??" blooming tianshi lotus

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •