“The first report, dated July 13, 2004, is titled "Khalid Sheikh Mohammed: Preeminent Source on al-Qaida." The second report, dated June 3, 2005, is titled "Detainee Reporting Pivotal for the War Against al-Qaida." As the titles suggest, these reports are not about the effectiveness or ineffectiveness of water-boarding and other techniques employed to elicit information from enemy combatants; they speak only to the value of the information gleaned from Sheikh Mohammed and other detainees. We know that Sheikh Mohammed and other detainees were water-boarded, but the reports shed no light on what they said before they were water-boarded versus what they said afterward.”
Weeeellllll……
Section: Inside Washington
"Soon, you will know."
That is the ominous statement an uncooperative Khalid Sheikh Mohammed (KSM), mastermind of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, made to his Central Intelligence Agency interrogators when they initially asked him, after he had been captured, about additional planned al Qaeda attacks on the United States.
In March 2003, KSM became the third and final terrorist ever waterboarded by the CIA. The other two were Abu Zubaydah and Rahim Al-Nashiri.
So few were waterboarded because the CIA was so strict on the criteria for deciding when the technique could be used.
As CIA Acting General Counsel John A. Rizzo explained in a 2004 letter to then Acting Assistant Atty. Gen. Daniel Levin of the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel, the CIA would resort to waterboarding a top al Qaeda leader only when the agency had "credible intelligence that a terrorist attack is imminent," "substantial and credible indicators that the subject has actionable intelligence that can prevent, disrupt or deny this attack" and "other interrogation methods have failed to elicit the information within the perceived time limit for preventing the attack."
Rizzo's letter, as quoted here, was cited in a May 30, 2005, memo to Rizzo from then-Principal Deputy Assistant Atty. Gen. Steven G. Bradbury, also of the Office of Legal Counsel.
Last Tuesday, the CIA confirmed to me that it stands by assertions credited to the agency in this 2005 memo that subjecting KSM to "enhanced techniques" of interrogation-including waterboarding--caused him to reveal information that allowed the U.S. government to stop a planned 9/11-style attack on Los Angeles.
The previously classified memo was released by President Obama.
Before they were waterboarded, both KSM and Abu Zubaydah did not believe Americans had the will to stop al Qaeda, the 2005 Justice Department memo says, citing information from the CIA.
"Both KSM and Zubaydah had 'expressed their belief that the general U.S. population was 'weak,' lacked resilience and would be unable to 'do what was necessary' to prevent the terrorists from succeeding in their goals,'" said the memo. "Indeed, before the CIA used enhanced techniques in its interrogation of KSM, KSM resisted giving any answers to questions about future attacks, simply noting, 'Soon, you will know.'"
After he was waterboarded, KSM provided the CIA with information that allowed the U.S. government to close down a terror cell already "tasked" with flying a jet into a building in Los Angeles.
"You have informed us that the interrogation of KSM--once enhanced techniques were employed--led to the discovery of a KSM plot, the 'Second Wave,' 'to use East Asian operatives to crash a hijacked airliner into' a building in Los Angeles," says the memo, referring to information CIA provided to Justice.
"You have informed us that information obtained from KSM also led to the capture of Riduan bin Isomuddin, better known as Hambali, and the discovery of the Guraba Cell, a 17- member Jemaah Islamiyah cell tasked with executing the 'Second Wave,'" said the memo.
"More specifically, we understand that KSM admitted that he had [redaction] large sum of money to an al Qaeda associate [redaction] … Khan subsequently identified the associate (Zubair), who was then captured," said the memo. "Zubair, in turn, provided information that led to the arrest of Hambali. The information acquired from these captures allowed CIA interrogators to pose more specific questions to KSM, which led the CIA (to) Hambali's brother, al-Hadi. Using information obtained from multiple sources, al-Hadi was captured, and he subsequently identified the Garuba cell. With the aid of this additional information, inter rogations of Hambali confirmed much of what was learned from KSM."
A CIA spokesman confirmed to me, as I first reported on CNSNews.com, that the CIA stands by the factual assertions made here.
While waterboarding was exceedingly rare in CIA interrogations of al Qaeda terrorists, it was routinely used on certain members of our own armed forces who went through "Survival, Evasion, Resistance, Escape" (SERE) training. According to another previously classified memo that Obama released, some branches of the U.S. military stopped using waterboarding in training certain troops not because water boarding had harmful long-term effects, but because it was so universally effective in extracting information.
"With respect to the waterboard, you have also orally informed us that the Navy continues to use it in training," said a 2002 Office of Legal Counsel memo to the CIA's Rizzo. "You have informed us that other services ceased use of the waterboard be cause it was so successful as an interrogation technique but not because of any concerns over harm, physical or mental, caused by it. It was also reported to be al most 100% effective in producing cooperation among trainees."
According to the CIA, it produced cooperation in the mastermind of 9-11 and thus yielded information used to stop a 9-11 type attack on the West Coast.
President Obama says he has prohibited the interrogation techniques described in the Justice Department memos he released. Next time the CIA catches a KSM, they must be kinder and gentler with him.
PHOTO (BLACK & WHITE): KHALID SHEIKH MOHAMMED, shown here in a courtroom sketch during a hearing in January at Guantanamo Bay, gave U.S. interrogators valuable intelligence about an upcoming terror attack in Los Angeles after repeatedly being waterboarded.
~~~~~~~~
By Terence P. Jeffrey
Mr. Jeffrey is HUMAN EVENTS editor-at-large. terencejeffrey@eaglepub.com
Jeffrey, T. (2009, April 27). Now-Banned Waterboarding Produced Intel That Stopped Attack. Human Events, 65(15), 8-8. Retrieved August 26, 2009, from Academic Search Complete database.
“And there was another problem: Neither of the two plotters who remained at large knew how to fly a plane.”
Actually, it’s not a problem. A chimp can fly those planes.
On the whole, though, it is very likely a hit and miss thing in terms of its ability to produce extra information that ends up being important. From the article you cited, it is clear that the act of using these techniques is capable of blowing up in our faces IF they are discovered.
Considering the fact that important information CAN be obtained from these methods, that the information can prevent an attack and that the use of the methods are harshly criticized and may cause trouble if discovered, all you have really done here is present a case for the secrecy of the use of these techniques.
Weeeellllll……
Section: Inside Washington
"Soon, you will know."
That is the ominous statement an uncooperative Khalid Sheikh Mohammed (KSM), mastermind of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, made to his Central Intelligence Agency interrogators when they initially asked him, after he had been captured, about additional planned al Qaeda attacks on the United States.
In March 2003, KSM became the third and final terrorist ever waterboarded by the CIA. The other two were Abu Zubaydah and Rahim Al-Nashiri.
So few were waterboarded because the CIA was so strict on the criteria for deciding when the technique could be used.
As CIA Acting General Counsel John A. Rizzo explained in a 2004 letter to then Acting Assistant Atty. Gen. Daniel Levin of the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel, the CIA would resort to waterboarding a top al Qaeda leader only when the agency had "credible intelligence that a terrorist attack is imminent," "substantial and credible indicators that the subject has actionable intelligence that can prevent, disrupt or deny this attack" and "other interrogation methods have failed to elicit the information within the perceived time limit for preventing the attack."
Rizzo's letter, as quoted here, was cited in a May 30, 2005, memo to Rizzo from then-Principal Deputy Assistant Atty. Gen. Steven G. Bradbury, also of the Office of Legal Counsel.
Last Tuesday, the CIA confirmed to me that it stands by assertions credited to the agency in this 2005 memo that subjecting KSM to "enhanced techniques" of interrogation-including waterboarding--caused him to reveal information that allowed the U.S. government to stop a planned 9/11-style attack on Los Angeles.
The previously classified memo was released by President Obama.
Before they were waterboarded, both KSM and Abu Zubaydah did not believe Americans had the will to stop al Qaeda, the 2005 Justice Department memo says, citing information from the CIA.
"Both KSM and Zubaydah had 'expressed their belief that the general U.S. population was 'weak,' lacked resilience and would be unable to 'do what was necessary' to prevent the terrorists from succeeding in their goals,'" said the memo. "Indeed, before the CIA used enhanced techniques in its interrogation of KSM, KSM resisted giving any answers to questions about future attacks, simply noting, 'Soon, you will know.'"
After he was waterboarded, KSM provided the CIA with information that allowed the U.S. government to close down a terror cell already "tasked" with flying a jet into a building in Los Angeles.
"You have informed us that the interrogation of KSM--once enhanced techniques were employed--led to the discovery of a KSM plot, the 'Second Wave,' 'to use East Asian operatives to crash a hijacked airliner into' a building in Los Angeles," says the memo, referring to information CIA provided to Justice.
"You have informed us that information obtained from KSM also led to the capture of Riduan bin Isomuddin, better known as Hambali, and the discovery of the Guraba Cell, a 17- member Jemaah Islamiyah cell tasked with executing the 'Second Wave,'" said the memo.
"More specifically, we understand that KSM admitted that he had [redaction] large sum of money to an al Qaeda associate [redaction] … Khan subsequently identified the associate (Zubair), who was then captured," said the memo. "Zubair, in turn, provided information that led to the arrest of Hambali. The information acquired from these captures allowed CIA interrogators to pose more specific questions to KSM, which led the CIA (to) Hambali's brother, al-Hadi. Using information obtained from multiple sources, al-Hadi was captured, and he subsequently identified the Garuba cell. With the aid of this additional information, inter rogations of Hambali confirmed much of what was learned from KSM."
A CIA spokesman confirmed to me, as I first reported on CNSNews.com, that the CIA stands by the factual assertions made here.
While waterboarding was exceedingly rare in CIA interrogations of al Qaeda terrorists, it was routinely used on certain members of our own armed forces who went through "Survival, Evasion, Resistance, Escape" (SERE) training. According to another previously classified memo that Obama released, some branches of the U.S. military stopped using waterboarding in training certain troops not because water boarding had harmful long-term effects, but because it was so universally effective in extracting information.
"With respect to the waterboard, you have also orally informed us that the Navy continues to use it in training," said a 2002 Office of Legal Counsel memo to the CIA's Rizzo. "You have informed us that other services ceased use of the waterboard be cause it was so successful as an interrogation technique but not because of any concerns over harm, physical or mental, caused by it. It was also reported to be al most 100% effective in producing cooperation among trainees."
According to the CIA, it produced cooperation in the mastermind of 9-11 and thus yielded information used to stop a 9-11 type attack on the West Coast.
President Obama says he has prohibited the interrogation techniques described in the Justice Department memos he released. Next time the CIA catches a KSM, they must be kinder and gentler with him.
PHOTO (BLACK & WHITE): KHALID SHEIKH MOHAMMED, shown here in a courtroom sketch during a hearing in January at Guantanamo Bay, gave U.S. interrogators valuable intelligence about an upcoming terror attack in Los Angeles after repeatedly being waterboarded.
~~~~~~~~
By Terence P. Jeffrey
Mr. Jeffrey is HUMAN EVENTS editor-at-large. terencejeffrey@eaglepub.com
Jeffrey, T. (2009, April 27). Now-Banned Waterboarding Produced Intel That Stopped Attack. Human Events, 65(15), 8-8. Retrieved August 26, 2009, from Academic Search Complete database.
“And there was another problem: Neither of the two plotters who remained at large knew how to fly a plane.”
Actually, it’s not a problem. A chimp can fly those planes.
On the whole, though, it is very likely a hit and miss thing in terms of its ability to produce extra information that ends up being important. From the article you cited, it is clear that the act of using these techniques is capable of blowing up in our faces IF they are discovered.
Considering the fact that important information CAN be obtained from these methods, that the information can prevent an attack and that the use of the methods are harshly criticized and may cause trouble if discovered, all you have really done here is present a case for the secrecy of the use of these techniques.
Comment