lol
lol
man..thats some funny shit
yea..anyway its not that im not reading your posts more i think i have a hard time wording what i mean, i just think that if you do spend more time thinking on the subject lipster that your views may change, i was saying maybe youd get a better understanding of your own belief, or youd atleast be able to accept the possible validity of others
i know you said you wanted to here others ideas etc, but what i was saying is maybe in time youd learn to accept that their ideas may be possibilities aswell
because you obviously do not have that frame of mind at the moment, you said it in your own words...
i dunno why you want to keep discussing the subject which is set in stone for you, but its not matter
the matter is, is that most people here have given you their beliefs or explanations of what they currently believe and youve just knocked them, instead of just saying..ok i understand where your coming from..its possible bla bla
because they related to yours..didnt knock your beliefs they just related to yours
you on the other hand just continued to knock the others in that post of yours, and what i was trying to come across as saying was just maybe in time youll be able to sit back and say..yes, its possible
thats actually all i was trying to say in the begining
but its funny as hell reading your response..truly it is
and btw about the jk2 duel we were supposed to have for so long..im gonna try and make it happen , my comp is still messed up, im just ultra busy with alot of other stuff, havent even gotten my comp looked at, my vid card has been out of my comp for like a month or more now, and now that im starting a new job(pays double my old one YAAAAAAAAAAAA) im gonna be even busier..but just wanted to let you know without sending you a pm or something that sooner or later ill get around to that death match
peace heheheheh
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Karma
Collapse
X
-
Perhaps I didn't explain myself well enough
Dao, this still doesn't address the issue of a Creator! So it's a cycle! So it changed form! It doesn't answer the question of where this 'energy' that forms matter originally [way back, if you want] came from...
So could you tell me the reason why there are different forms of existence? If everything is the same, nothing is ultimately superior, why different forms in the first place? If there aren't different levels of superiority then the same purpose would have been achieved through a single form of existence.
I'm not trying to question anyone's beleifs, I'm not trying to tell anyone what they should and should not do with their lives, I'm just trying to offer others the oppurtunity to see through the lies we've all been taught. I had the oppurtunity and, though it took me 20 years, I have just now begun to sieze it. So I'm just trying to offer you that same oppurtunity. Do with it what you will.
Leave a comment:
-
Brainless twat.
OH MY GOD. (If you do exist...). That's ****ing funny!
Yes, Vince does have talent. Sometimes a little misdirected at times, but still there. We have to help him nurture it.
Leave a comment:
-
And I really don't know why I get so wound up when you lay on this shit...I shouldn't...
You have a talent Vince...
Leave a comment:
-
Well that's the point Vince, I'm not looking to convert anyone to my views. I just wrote that I'm not looking for answers. I'm just presenting my views and reading others'. Out of INTEREST.
READ THE GODDAMN ****IN WORDS YOU BRAINLESS TWAT.
God, I hate it when you come up with this arrogant bullshit Vince. "Maybe his mind will change in time." Well excuse me sir, I love the way you think your views are automatically more legitimate than mine. I know you think that I don't, but I really [really really] do understand your problems with my mode of rationale and thought. I think I've already established in a God thread we had a while ago that we have two completely different modes of thought. That's why when you read my stuff it just seems like confused bullshit to you. The reason for this stems from a single simple point. There are two viewpoints of existence - the pragmatic view and the realist view. We occupy opposite ends. This is why you never seem to be able to pick up [on the point of] what I'm saying and why you think I can never truly understand what you're saying.
If you're not aware of the definition of pragmatic and realist viewpoints of existence, look it up. If you can't find anything I'll explain what they mean.
And please point out my flaws.
(deep breath) Peace bro...Last edited by Lipster; 06-16-2003, 06:50 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
lol
lol when people ask borderline satori questions i like to give answers like that because its the best way for them to find their answers..
really it doesnt matter what anyone says, its not like were gonna convince lipster of what we believe is right..
he obviously believes in "the alpha and the omega"
well maybe his mind will change in time, maybe not
but lipster, what your talking about has obvious flaws and contradictions, your own words im talkin about here
but it really doesnt matter, maybe your having a hard time explaining what you feel, who cares..the point is you believe it, its your beliefs not ours..i doubt anyone here is gonna change the way you feel with a few well placed words and such
so whats the point of arguing beliefs when they arent really gonna be radically changed by anyone..at best we can only make each other think things over etc
Leave a comment:
-
Jess,
If there is a Creator or Origin, it must exist as an element outside the set called the universe, either through time (before the set was created, an Origin must exist in order to create it later on), or space (the Origin cannot have created itself, and thus cannot be in the set).
So now there's a problem - a creator wants to create, but there's no place to put it because He is already everywhere. If you're in a room which is shaped exactly to match the contours of your body, how are you going to bring something else into that room? [This does not imply that the creator is limited though, the 'space' may be infinite, but so is the being.] Well the only thing to do is to suck in your gut. And that's what had to happen; this Being could no longer fill up all of infinity. He had to create some space where something besides himself could exist. And that's the basic concept of restriction; a Kabbalistical perspective on the creation of existence. The actual formation of existence is the next step, but it's long....
There don't have to be sets; [one view holds] we are contained in the Creator Itself.
Does this make any sense to you?
and this leads into the second big point.....if everything comes from a single creator, then, well, what creates the creator? of course you could make an exemption for the creator and give it special powers, like, the ability not to be created...haha. of course, special exemptions for no reason than other to make your argument work is hogwash and highly illogical.
What do we mean when we say something comes to an "end"? Is "ending" even something that actually happens or is it a made up concept which we fabricated in the creation of verbal language? Is it simply a made up concept used to attempt to describe the way things cease to be in the form we once knew them in? If this is the case, and I really believe that it is, don't we delude ourselves with the idea that the object in question actually "ended"? Didn't it really just change forms?
It is also a typical human assumption that there has to be some "supreme being" behind it all, many of us can't possibly cope with the idea that we are not in any way superior to any other form of life on earth. And for that matter, we aren’t even superior to the nonliving stuff on earth.
Oh and whoever's gonna tell me to look from the answers within again; I'm not looking for enlightenment, I'm looking for discussion.
Peace guys...
Leave a comment:
-
Because it is inconceivable and irrational that anything doesn't. Nothing creates itself. Everything comes from a single Creator.
according to jains, there was never a point of creation and there will never be an end, that the universe has been going through a cycle of creation and destruction forever. while the idea might be mind-blowing if you think about it too long, its actually way more simpler than dealing with a so-called creator God. and while the idea of God in Jainism and parts of Hinduism and Buddhism still exists, they dont see it a separate personality, that God is the sum of the universe, that God is simply our primitive and human-like way of accepting Dharma.
now, i have no idea how buddhism deals with issues such as these, since 1) it really has little bearing on attaining enlightenment (look up buddha's answers dealing questions of the self or atman, you'll see what i mean) and 2) i imagine there would be no real consensus among buddhists. but....this is good for looking at things like karma and dharma, and maybe freeing your mind from constraints of customary thinking.
Leave a comment:
-
Oh, god, it's a metaphysical daoist rant......... head for the hills.
Ok, so I'm going to venture a radical statement here and say that it's a typical anthropocentric human response to assume that everything must have a creator and things must have a begining and an end. As such, this view is predominantly metaphysical hogwash packaged in a solution of snake oil.
It is also a typical human assumption that there has to be some "supreme being" behind it all, many of us can't possibly cope with the idea that we are not in any way superior to any other form of life on earth. And for that matter, we arent even superior to the nonliving stuff on earth. Is it really so hard to admit and understand that life just IS? Is it so hard to understand and accept that things change and there is no such thing as an end or a begining or superior or inferior? Is it so hard to grasp the principle that being and non-being are inherently the same?
What do we mean when we say something comes to an "end"? Is "ending" even something that actually happens or is it a made up concept which we fabricated in the creation of verbal language? Is it simply a made up concept used to attempt to describe the way things cease to be in the form we once knew them in? If this is the case, and I really beleive that it is, don't we delude ourselves with the idea that the object in question actually "ended"? Didn't it really just change forms?
And what in the hell do we mean to say when we say something "began"? I've encountered many events, ranging from the onset of a storm to the birth of a child, which many people would call "beginings" but did anything actually start that wasn't there before this "begining"? No. In my brief life in this current form, I've seen nothing come into being which did not manifest itself from energy that was already there.
To summarize. Life and death are one and the same. Every moment of your life you are constantly dying and being born anew on a cellular level. Even the neurons in the adult brain are replaced occasionally (contrary to a slightly archaic though widely held medical belief, if you need medical evidence for this statement, go hunt through medical journals online, it was realized in the past 5 years). Life and death are but illusions, we (and by we I mean every organism, and every inorganic piece of matter on this planet, as well as every gust of wind, etc.) are but complex fields of energy. We who call ourselves human are simply extremely complex, self-perpetuating, self-aware electromagnetic fields. Matter is only a form which energy takes. What most call "death" is merely that energy changing into a different form. What most call "birth" is the exact same thing, energy changing forms. If I think well of my life I must therefore think well of my death.
As for suffering...................
Read Marcus Aurelius' Meditations.
You can stop suffering on an individual level anytime you want to. The only thing which can allow an outside force to harm your mind is your mind itself. Mental anguish is permitted by the mind and can only be alleviated by the mind which created it. Accept death, accept your limitations, accept your pain, and learn from it. Free yourself from desire and you free yourself from the ability to suffer. After all, what is the source of pain? It derives from being denied that which we desire. And what do we desire? Life, knowledge, happiness, and love. If you stop looking for these things in the outside world, and learn to free yourself from the bonds of desire, you will find them within your own spirit.
Leave a comment:
-
impossiblity of nature my good sir
the wheels on the bus go round and round, round and round, round and round
the wheels on the bus go round and round..all through the town...
Leave a comment:
-
Because it is inconceivable and irrational that anything doesn't. Nothing creates itself. Everything comes from a single Creator.
Is this a genuine belief based upon some sort of facts, or, beliefs based upon what was drilled into our heads during childhood???
Just curious. Personally, I don't have an answer to this.
Leave a comment:
-
oh my sand
"Lol, glad you can make that call. You're way too set with your philosophical points - nothing's obvious at this point."
what comes around goes around, ive been convinced this is a universal truth since i was in my early teens..it just does
and after studying the i ching i only feel more confident in my assumptions about karma/change/interactions of heaven-earth ingeneral
it just seems to make sense..and i havent even been studying that long
but like i say..i feel this is true, doesnt make it so, just makes sense to me
but, on the subject of karma ingeneral..
what comes around..really goes around
positive of that one
Leave a comment:
-
why does everything have to have a source?
thats how i feel anyway, i dont think it matters how karma works, it works, its obvious
it would be more comfortable to believe that good merits and bad would be judged by an all knowing master of the universe now wouldnt it, itd be alot easier to accept, deny, or mock wouldnt it? things dont come easy, even if you do understand the intellectual concept of karma you cant fully understand it whole heartedly if you dont understand what you are
I'm not getting what you're trying to say here.
instead of asking why and seeking answers from without, i think it would be better to meditate on the subject and seek your own answers from within
Leave a comment:
-
damn cows...
cows gots to have small brains....
why does everything have to have a source?
and what does that mean anyway? as we understand it? a begining and an end as we interpret it?
how about this "supreme being" you refer to
or how "someone" or "something" is making decisions on where or what karma is to be done with
it would be more comfortable to believe that good merits and bad would be judged by an all knowing master of the universe now wouldnt it, itd be alot easier to accept, deny, or mock wouldnt it?
things dont come easy, even if you do understand the intellectual concept of karma you cant fully understand it whole heartedly if you dont understand what you are
thats how i feel anyway, i dont think it matters how karma works, it works, its obvious
instead of asking why and seeking answers from without, i think it would be better to meditate on the subject and seek your own answers from within
...now go forth grasshopper, and mow my lawn..
o.O
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: