The NIST report on tower 7 is apparently due soon so relying on an article from last year debunking an earlier report, to prove or disprove anything now is a little premature.
They (NIST) are using 'extremely complex' (their words) computer modelling (ie. mathematics) to prove/disprove various theories.. probably better than just testing bits of metal in a lab since I imagine its damn near impossible to impose the exact physical conditions which existed at the site. In fact a combination of lab testing and computer modelling (and other methods) is likely to be used, not one or the other.
From the conspiracy camp:
Well.. if the building support columns were on the outside then falling straight down would presumably be the path of least resistance..
You should watch some of those 'air crash investigations' on national geographic to see the incredible things that can happen.. the smallest, seemingly most insignificant things (such as a bit of forgotten duct tape) can set off unimaginable chain reactions causing a catastrophe.. no mysterious coverup, just a combination of unfortunate and often unforeseeable events and reactions..
Sometimes shit just happens and it takes several years of painstaking research to piece it all together and find out the cause.. and thats just with a plane accident, imagine the immense task involved with something like the 9/11 disaster.
No conspiracy.. just a major terrorist attack with a catastrophic result. Unfortunately it's probably not the last we'll see.
Exactly what these "mathematics" entail and why they are more reliable than actual scientific lab tests of WTC steel undertaken by NIST as well as the basic laws of physics and gravity is not fully explained in the article.
From the conspiracy camp:
"Buildings that fall in natural processes fall to the path of least resistance", says Gage (founder of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth), "they don't go straight down through themselves.
You should watch some of those 'air crash investigations' on national geographic to see the incredible things that can happen.. the smallest, seemingly most insignificant things (such as a bit of forgotten duct tape) can set off unimaginable chain reactions causing a catastrophe.. no mysterious coverup, just a combination of unfortunate and often unforeseeable events and reactions..
Sometimes shit just happens and it takes several years of painstaking research to piece it all together and find out the cause.. and thats just with a plane accident, imagine the immense task involved with something like the 9/11 disaster.
No conspiracy.. just a major terrorist attack with a catastrophic result. Unfortunately it's probably not the last we'll see.
Comment