michael jackson

[doc]

I'm a bad Buddhist. I admit it.

Another 20,000 docdollars on GUILTY.

Bad, bad Buddhist.

[zachsan]

XJ, have you personally interviewed each person who commented on this thread, and bet on the item, to find out how and why they came to the conclusions they did?

if not, you are leaping to the conclusion that they didn't consider the facts, without, well, considering the facts. by your definition, that would make you an ignorant fool.

[xing_jian108]

Zachsan, have you totally missed what I said? I explained the comments I made were directed toward those you have not followed the case closely and openly on both sides and then make jokes and judgments. They know who they are. If you are not one, disregard it.

[zachsan]

no XJ, you have to have talked to the people you're griping about, and you have to know who they are. otherwise you're either judging people without considering the facts, or, you're talking out of your ass.

and don't worry, i haven't missed what you said.

I think it's safe to say, and not high and mighty, that most everyone in this thread is an "ignorant fool".

[plumflower_pm]

It would seem, XJ, that you should do a little research to balance your own skewed opinion.

In 1993, Mr. Jackson paid a family 20 million dollars when faced with charges of molesting their 13 year old son. Mr Jackson was in asia at the time on tour, and after being informed of some of the evidence that was to be called out in court, He had his lawyers make the settlement offer.

He is currently up on 11 separate charges of child molestation, there has been sworn testimony that he has given alchohol to underage children, shared pornography with children in his home, shared his bed with more than one boy who was visiting him, and was seen taking a shower with an 8 year old boy.

He has three children of his own, none of which he cares for full time.

[plumflower_pm]

oh yea baby, I do MY homework.

neener neener neener.

[xing_jian108]

Zachsan, as I said, I was speaking directly to certain people. They know who they are and they should be the ones in this conversation with me, if anyone. If you are not one of those people making ignorant claims and jokes, why are you talking to me? And if most people in this thread are actually following the case closely and fairly on both sides, then let them speak up and tell me what they know and where they get their info. Otherwise, don't concern yourself.

Plumflower, if you actually continued your homework you'd know most of those things have been either proven untrue or not proven in anyway. Sworn testimony means precisely sh!t. His accuser has admitting to lying under oath about sexual abuse before just to get money! Don't rely on yahoo! news for your info..

Again, my posts were started because of ignorant claims and jokes. They aren't in anyway funny. If you think he is guilty, that's your opinion and you are entitled to it. It doesn't make it true. And the jokes are not only about Michael Jackson. The jokes are about something terrible that may have happened to young children. Why the hell would you make jokes of something like that?! Sick people..

[zachsan]

Zachsan, as I said, I was speaking directly to certain people. They know who they are and they should be the ones in this conversation with me, if anyone. If you are not one of those people making ignorant claims and jokes, why are you talking to me? And if most people in this thread are actually following the case closely and fairly on both sides, then let them speak up and tell me what they know and where they get their info. Otherwise, don't concern yourself.

i gather you don't much like being talked to unless it's to kiss your ass.

calling most of the people on the thread ignorant fools, and then saying simply that they know who they are, is about as far away from "speaking directly to certain people" as it gets. and apparently, i'm not even allowed to disagree with you, lest i prove myself to be in fact an ignorant fool. so one apparently has the option of either agreeing with you and saying so, or being an ignorant fool and shutting up. in other words, there's no room for argument, or as you put it, examining both sides of the case.

sorry pal, but that's more than a little arrogant, not to mention incredibly stupid, and hypocritical. how's that for a judgment?

[shaolinstylee]

wow, this is still going...

only a few more rocks will just about do in that glass house.

[doc]

XJ, just curious how you're going to respond to all of this when your king of pop becomes the favorite queen of the cell block.

Maybe it's time for a new bet.

Another 10000 DD's on GUILTY. I'm goin all da way.

[blooming tianshi lotus]

Another stubborn bad assed buddhist . Just what the world needs


1900 dd he's proven innocent

BL

[doc]

Another stubborn bad assed buddhist . Just what the world needs


1900 dd he's proven innocent

BL

Hahaha. Best thing you ever said BABE.

You're bitch is going down. Another 5000 DD's says there will be a new popular date in the Sacramento prison system soon.

[shaolinstylee]

He'll get something special if convicted... no regular cell.... a lot less bubba time if you will.

[blooming tianshi lotus]

If I had 10 000 DD , I'd put it on a bet that bubba sits around crying for 6 cold winters over the bitch he waited for and throws up from grief and lonliness in helgas husbands grits!!!

Btw : my babe stays and so does the support for my bitch!
Which one are .......... forget it ......... I'm broke anyway for a week or two and the cyber bookies are going to have trouble paying as it is.


Steve and I are cashing in anyway so all is well regardless. Dammed rich ass expendable dd endowed buddhist bitches! ......... If you loose it all, and someone steals what you fabricate to cover your losses just
Thank god for free lunches then ha

You goin down babe and your lawyers are going with ya! :P

You good with that???


Lotus

[xing_jian108]

Zachsan, it's not that you either agree with me or don't talk to me. I said whoever is saying cheap jokes and accusing but not following the case is an ignorant fool. If they aren't, they should tell me what they know of the case and where they get their news. No one has been able to argue their opinion of why he's guilty with nothing more than cheap personal attacks on him. So, why are you still talking to me? Who are you again?

Doc, I have no personal relationship to Michael. I told you exactly how I feel. I want him to be innocent for his sake and for the sake of the children who shouldn't ever be treated that way. If he is PROVEN guilty, then by all means, give him what he deserves. But if he is innocent, judge it that way, and be happy for the children. Also be angry at the idiots who made the whole case to start with cuz like I said, other children are being sexual abused out there right at we speak. Who's working so hard to stop them?!

Plumflower, I'm a stubborn badassed Buddhist? Because I don't cheap jokes on people I have never met and know very little about? Because I don't join everyone else to fit in? Because I can be the only one out of all those who post on this thread who can actually give a sh!t about people's lives? Because your opinion of me means precisely sh!t? Maybe just because I don't see things the way you do, talk the way you do, or act the way you do. If that makes me a stubborn badassed Buddhist then I wouldn't want to be anything different.