I've been thinking about this for a while and, although I think BL and I have come to similar conclusions, maybe I have a bit of a different twist on things.
-------------
China’s growth was tremendous, it just wasn't influenced by the rest of the world, and they did little to incorporate newer, more efficient methods into "their world." Though actually astoundingly industrious, China essentially turned inward throughout the song period with very little interest in the direction of innovation. This happened because China's population became the largest in the world at this time, and basically they were forced to develop the most efficient "feeding system" as a result. Their primary focus, and all of their resources, ultimately rested on feeding people. Unfortunately, where others eventually turned to technology and innovation to increase agricultural productivity, China utilized very labor intensive methods to do the same job, and they've only recently attempted to change.
China was also pretty much devoid of an real education system. It was a tradition society. Trades and skills were not learned in the classroom as they are today, they were passed down from master to student. It was the family's duty to seek out and create these oppotunities by developing more and more "guanxi" in society. If you found a teacher, you learned what he or she passed down to you, which left little room for students to investigate things on their own. Of course if you had good "guanxi," you could find good jobs for people and bypass, if you will, the trade industry for positions in government.
So, a strong dependence on the past remained with little vision for the future. It seems to me, therefore, that the problem we see today in modern China is not necessarily related to communism, but is rather a combination of the effects from an increase in population during the song period, a stubborn ignorance concerning the benefits of innovation and trade sometime thereafter, as well as an almost non-exexistent educational system.....
-------------
China’s growth was tremendous, it just wasn't influenced by the rest of the world, and they did little to incorporate newer, more efficient methods into "their world." Though actually astoundingly industrious, China essentially turned inward throughout the song period with very little interest in the direction of innovation. This happened because China's population became the largest in the world at this time, and basically they were forced to develop the most efficient "feeding system" as a result. Their primary focus, and all of their resources, ultimately rested on feeding people. Unfortunately, where others eventually turned to technology and innovation to increase agricultural productivity, China utilized very labor intensive methods to do the same job, and they've only recently attempted to change.
China was also pretty much devoid of an real education system. It was a tradition society. Trades and skills were not learned in the classroom as they are today, they were passed down from master to student. It was the family's duty to seek out and create these oppotunities by developing more and more "guanxi" in society. If you found a teacher, you learned what he or she passed down to you, which left little room for students to investigate things on their own. Of course if you had good "guanxi," you could find good jobs for people and bypass, if you will, the trade industry for positions in government.
So, a strong dependence on the past remained with little vision for the future. It seems to me, therefore, that the problem we see today in modern China is not necessarily related to communism, but is rather a combination of the effects from an increase in population during the song period, a stubborn ignorance concerning the benefits of innovation and trade sometime thereafter, as well as an almost non-exexistent educational system.....
Comment